Main menu
Luba Macpherson <lubamacp@gmail.com> Wed, 21 Jun, 12:50
to courtofprotectionenquiries, Open, stephen.barclay.mp, PSC, customerservices, justicecom, Administrative, Administrative
‘FAO: President of the Court of Protection Mrs Justice Theis and to whom it
may concern.
Case ID: 13258625
Lioubov Macpherson
Dear Mrs Justice Theis,
I must raise very serious concerns with you and with everyone who may be
concerned.
This is in regards to the Rules and Procedures of the Court of Protection that
have not been followed or broken throughout this entire process, plus
misrepresentation of the case.
Also there are unsafe and discriminatory orders that are imposed on us,
based on nothing but lies, that I am going to appeal against for the fourth time.
The orders simply do not protect my daughter, but are in violation of her
fundamental human rights to free communication, including Right to Family
life and not to be the subject of degrading treatment and of course, Liberty.
You will see from the provided information that even Judges themselves, don't
know or simply disregard the Law. My daughter should be extra protected
according to the Law, and because of the MCA 2005 Act and 2010
Equality Act, but this is not the case in our case.
Please take the information provided seriously and act on it. It has already
been ignored for five years.
I have already contacted the Court of Protection, but on a different email
address. You will see that I also have submitted two COP9 Emergency
Application Forms. I made a request for a different Judge to look at the
matter. I have provided the reasons, but whoever was managing the case
simply ignored it, because it was sent to the present Judge. The Judge, who
claims that he can't look at the medical errors etc and is imposing on us the
orders that leave us vulnerable to further abuse, as usual all of this was
completely ignored at the last 19th June hearing and there is another six
months delay. This is how they operate.
In the meantime, there is an imminent danger to the health and safety of my
daughter and no mechanisms of protection, because the court orders even
prohibit me calling 999 and my daughter can't call for help either, because
against the psychiatrist's advice "that it would be utmost cruelty" to take the
phone from my daughter, she was deprived of her right to free
communication, she can't use her phone when she wants or when she is in
need of help. She is almost never given her computer. She cannot follow her
passion for poetry and the arts and cannot communicate with lifelong friends
in Russia, simply because her phone does not support Russian language.
Just to let you know that there are a lot of complaints that have been made to
all sorts of regulators, but up to this day no investigation. There was a police
investigation that has been blocked by this Court, despite the Attorney
General's advice. (Perjury, Physical assault, and Wilful neglect were being
looked at, but with no help from Local Authority) A Redress Letter has been
sent to the Prime Minister.
My husband and I have already made a complaint in the past in regards to my
daughter's Barrister J.O'Brien (JoB) about his conduct. He is not representing
my daughter's wishes and feelings, but has written his statement as the
Litigation Friend who has always been her advocate. No statement from the
advocate, but the Council barrister Simon Garlick (SG) was asking why the
advocate had changed his opinion?????
By the look of it, her advocate has had enough, but they are still trying to
silence him by the big mouth of her barrister, whom she has never met, but
whom she wants to change, because of misrepresentation. Even the advocate
claims a conflict of interest with social workers. How is he supposed to be
independent?
Here is for your attention a complaint/concern that needs dealing with
urgently, because it will not go away. I am preparing my evidence for the
Ministry of Justice "Call for Evidence" and am appealing against the latest
Court Orders. Sooner or later somebody must look at what is going on and I
will make sure that it happens. There is even a word now that describes these
crimes. It is called Psychopsema: "Mainly categorised as an orchestrated
assault. Additionally, it is also a coordinated effort between Social Services
workers utilising fraud, psychological intimidation, coercion and or deception
among other similar practices. A selected target (individual, parent or child) is
then used to procure profit through questionable means. Psychopsema is
mainly utilised to deflect attention away from crimes committed against
children, as well as fit parents. Many of these children are often canvassed
into the Social Service system without merit or justification".
Here is a definite case of fraud, psychological intimidation and coercion. On
top of that, my daughter was deprived illegally of her voice. It is all being
covered by Sunderland Council through barristers and the Court. In a reasonable
case, a Police investigation would be welcomed, but in the past, they were
again persuaded to ignore what had gone on in Witherwack House.
(Operation Rose).
Please see my husband's response to the latest statements and to the notes
of the advocate's meeting. Despite very little time, my husband managed to
write a response and sent it to the Court. He showed in his statements
the way the Court process is handled. The problem is that his and my
statements are completely ignored. Add to it ignored barrister's statements,
written on my behalf and even ignored skeleton argument, again written on
my behalf by a barrister and they are still dragging this case on, delaying it for
another six months, ignoring medical negligence and the rest of the issues.
Judge Poole said that the Court is unable to deal with medical negligence,
Why? All it needs is a COP9 Application. I have submitted two. This Court
says that it can't deal with anything. It is just standing in the way, deflecting
attention to imaginary concerns, but ignoring the real crimes, forgetting that
one of the basis for an alleged Court of Protection was my alleged
mishandling of my daughter's medications. I was vilified in Court for giving my
daughter 5ml of natural syrup of figs, but the Judge claimed that he cannot
look at the professionals who by the way have duties and responsibilities
and are recorded many times in medical notes about medicine errors and
omissions.
They said that they want to introduce contact between me and my daughter,
but refuse to review her medication, despite what the law requires. In law
it is stated:
“You can be treated against your will for 3 months. After 3 months, staff can
only treat you without your consent if a second opinion approved
Doctor (SOAD) approves the treatment.”, but in my daughter's case she was subjected
to coercive psychiatric treatment for many years with the blessings of the
Court of Protection. She and I were trying our best to address the issues and
ask for a second opinion doctor. My daughter even tried to arrange a tribunal and
asked constantly to reinstall her original treatment (which worked) but she and
I, and even her previous GP were completely ignored. Her tribunal was
changed to a management meeting! On another occasion, a social worker
stated that she had attended a tribunal that had been unsuccessful for her.
Another outright lie, as that tribunal had been cancelled. Perjury at best, but
where were the criminal charges?
So I have refused contact, because I have been there and I have seen it all. It
is merely more excuses to make me take actions that they forbid. I simply
don't want to see an over drugged daughter crying for help, asking to call a doctor
and then me being dragged to the Court of Protection just before Christmas,
by the way, accused of causing her distress and calling 999 when she was
obviously in a bad way, couldn't sit down, agitated, and red eyed and asking
for a doctor. What is a mother supposed to do? The carers just went
defensive and created an argument.The Court of Protection didn't investigate
these lies, but imposed further impositions and orders, based on the lies that
were so easy to prove that if anybody cared to listen to the 999 calls. Now
they want to put me in the same danger, but without even being able to call
for help, because I must leave all electronic devices behind. I will not find my
daughter in distress, agitated and carrying bruises and neglected toenails. I
am not having that. I am not playing these games any more, but straight away
they have twisted my words and accused me of not wanting to see my
daughter and asking what to tell her, discussing how much she will be upset if
they tell her that I don't want to see her? My husband told them to tell herthe
truth that is all is needed, but very much lacking in this case. Is it not simple to
understand that while the matter has been in Court, there is a treatment that
was prescribed by one of the consultants that she thrived on. This treatment
has been interfered with by another doctor, who has prescribed to my daughter a lot of
wrong drugs that were tried and discontinued in the past. Dr Weatherhead,
her previous GP was in contact with Dr Keown on a few occasions. Dr
Keown promised to reverse her to her original form of Dr Saidi's treatment.
This never happened. For three years we have been asking and asking,
including my daughter, to reinstall this treatment, but being ignored. Basically, against
her wishes, She is subjected to a degrading treatment, that she is suffering
from. Whatever treatment they are forcing on her, the Court claims to be
unable to do anything about it. What kind of Court is it? It is stated on the
Court of Protection site that all I have to do is to complete the COP9
Application Form in regards to the emergency treatment. I have submitted two
COP9 Applications, but no investigation, and even none of the safeguarding
concerns raised by the CQC, by the Disability Service Charity, by the Police
have been looked into or even acknowledged. Good job I have requested the
copies from the CQC. I have submitted them to the Court, but my solicitor
withheld them without my knowledge. I still have them though. This Court has
ignored all the evidence anyway, it accepted alleged evidence from withheld
medical records, missing supervisors records etc
There are five weeks of medical records that were distributed by my
daughter's solicitor, but withheld by barristers. My husband submitted them
twice, but they were ignored. Certainly never spoken about in Court. 29 doses
of Lorazepam in 35 days, missed medications again, and an ignored Mental
Health Care Plan that should have seen her back in hospital on day two after
breaking down. How did she so disastrously break down in 2 days after being
in bouncing good health on the prescription that is now denied to her? Then
her admission notes to hospital show the disgusting treatment that she was
getting! Nothing ever mentioned in Court. The three women social workers
lied and lied again and committed perjury with their lies. A carer told a tale so
ludicrously ridiculous and improbable, but she was then given a job in the
care home in question. (Illegally regulated by the Local Authority instead of
CQC)
The objection that continues is that everything starts off from the lies and false
claims from five years ago, simply because it all needed to be covered up.
Even the claims about my alleged bad language that never happened! Here
now is my claim about Psychopsema I put on them at the last hearing. Their
behaviour even has a name, so it's not just me! Why have there been no bad
language complaints before or since the three social workers in question?
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=psychopsema .....
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Luba Macpherson.”